Reasons why Federer is better than Sampras
Pete Sampras is one the greatest tennis players of all times, however Federer's all court game, intuition, and diverse ability makes Roger better than Sampras. Sampras,in my mind, is the best server (consistent) and will probably never be another like him. But Federer has a "tremedous" baseline game with a very strong and accurate forehand, good backhand and vollying skills. And lets not forget that Roger also has a good serve and can kick it up a notch when he feels the pressure is on. Ive never seen another tennis player that can pick up another level as quickly as roger. ALot of tennis players pick up their level too late in the game to later find out that their behind two sets and down a break. Roger has a better game to break his opponent than Sampras. Ive seen Sampras wait for the right moment and break a few times but federer seems to do it quite regularly. And Unfortunately Sampras's backhand return of serve is not good. It can make a few good shots, thats it. Its not consistent like rogers. WHat do you think?